Return-Path: <DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com>
Delivered-To:
info@drdmotor.user
Received: (qmail 20891
invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 22:30:25 -0000
Received: from unknown
(HELO imo-m25.mx.aol.com) (64.12.137.6)
by ns1.server295.com with
SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 22:30:25 -0000
Received: from DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
by
imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id i.1a2.3838aec7 (4410)
for
<info@drdmotorsportssucks.com>; Mon, 25 Jul
2005 18:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
Message-ID:
<1a2.3838aec7.3016c23b@aol.com>
Date: Mon,
25 Jul 2005 18:31:23 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
To: info@drdmotorsportssucks.com
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-----------------------------1122330683"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for
Windows sub 5011
-------------------------------1122330683
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
busted! this will be turned over to our
legal department for copywrite
issues and to the macomb county
prosecuters' office for slander. you have until
8:00am july 26,
2005 to remove this .
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include —
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Return-Path: <DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com>
Delivered-To:
info@drdmotor.user
Received: (qmail 17187
invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 23:09:41 -0000
Received: from unknown
(HELO imo-m27.mx.aol.com) (64.12.137.8)
by ns1.server295.com with
SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 23:09:41 -0000
Received: from DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
by
imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id i.6d.49eb5555 (4410)
for
<info@drdmotorsportssucks.com>; Mon, 25 Jul
2005 19:10:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
Message-ID:
<6d.49eb5555.3016cb6e@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 25
Jul 2005 19:10:38 EDT
Subject: Re: (no subject)
To: info@drdmotorsportssucks.com
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-----------------------------1122333038"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for
Windows sub 5011
Return-Path: <DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com>
Delivered-To:
info@drdmotor.user
Received: (qmail 15360
invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 23:12:36 -0000
Received: from unknown
(HELO imo-m17.mx.aol.com) (64.12.138.207)
by ns1.server295.com with
SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 23:12:36 -0000
Received: from DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
by
imo-m17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id i.96.2bfc4ee6 (4410)
for
<info@drdmotorsportssucks.com>; Mon, 25 Jul
2005 19:13:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
Message-ID:
<96.2bfc4ee6.3016cc1a@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 25
Jul 2005 19:13:30 EDT
Subject: Re: (no subject)
To: info@drdmotorsportssucks.com
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-----------------------------1122333210"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for
Windows sub 5011
The THIRD letter I sent to
ABUSE@AOL.COM,
because I previously instructed him to CEASE any direct contact with
me, but we all know that AOL doesn't give a flying fuck about their own AUP,
unless it concerns some minor "chat-room" indescression.
On a side-note: the TWO trucks (that David Derderian speaks so fondly of):
the first one I drove was filthy when I moved my stuff into it. I took out two
boxes of dirty socks, underwear and assorted papers, clothes and other
junk (which belonged to David Derderian), as well as several dollars worth
of "returnables".
The second truck I drove had paperwork
scattered all over the truck, including applications from other drivers,
collection notices, letters from customer's lawyers and insurance companies demanding payment for (damage) claims,
signed delivery paperwork and assorted fuel reciepts. Those papers, I left
stacked on the passenger seat of the first truck. (Driver's door wouldn't
open) I also took home with me about $12 worth of "returnables", which David
threatened to "charge" me for.
When I left BOTH trucks, I
left them both vaccumed (not mopped) and far cleaner than when I got into
them.
So, WHO is the PIG?
Return-Path:
<DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com>
Delivered-To:
info@drdmotor.user
Received: (qmail 16165
invoked from network); 25 Jul 2005 23:34:05 -0000
Received: from unknown
(HELO imo-d23.mx.aol.com) (205.188.139.137)
by ns1.server295.com with
SMTP; 25 Jul 2005 23:34:05 -0000
Received: from DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
by
imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id i.19e.38103ba3 (4410)
for
<info@drdmotorsportssucks.com>; Mon, 25 Jul
2005 19:35:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: DRDMOTORSPORTS@aol.com
Message-ID:
<19e.38103ba3.3016d127@aol.com>
Date: Mon,
25 Jul 2005 19:35:03 EDT
Subject: Re: (no subject)
To: info@drdmotorsportssucks.com
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="-----------------------------1122334503"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for
Windows sub 5011
I forwarded THIS email to ABUSE@AOL.COM as well, and will continue to do
so until this MORON "gets a clue".
On another
note: Here David all-but ADMITS my allegations are TRUE. If he is not
admitting them, why does he even mention it? The old "if I go down, YOU go down with me" intimidation tactic.
And he
thinks notifying any "prospective" employer of my web sites will affect in
any way my ability to get a job. I have told every employer of my previous
website (www.flyingjsux.com),
incase they require me to use Flying J as a fuel stop. If I can't get a
job based solely on my ability to do the work within the law and safely, than
the fault is with the employers, not me. Don't ya
think?
Additionally; every one of David Derderian's
emails
are typical of
the greater unwashed and uneducated who use AOL as their ISP.